A Federal High Court in Ado-Ekiti on Tuesday declined Governor Ayo Fayose’s bid to de-freeze his account frozen by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) about two weeks ago.
Rather, Justice Taiwo Taiwo ordered the EFCC and Zenith Bank, the first and second defendants, to come on July 4 to show cause why the order being sought by Governor Fayose should be refused.
The judge held that with the kind of order being sought by Fayose, the defendants must be heard.
Justice Taiwo said he understood that Fayose enjoyed immunity and that the court could adjudicate on the matter as canvassed by his counsel, Mike Ozekhome, but held that the relief he sought was a mandatory order of the court.
“I agree that the applicant has immunity, pursuant to the provisions of the constitution. But it is glaring that the application he is requesting is a mandatory order to undo what had been done and the court can’t abdicate its duty under this circumstance.
“I am of the opinion that this mandatory order is better granted with the interlocutory order being sought through an application pending before the court, because the applicant has filed papers to this effect.
“I hereby ordered the first and second respondents to appear before this court on July 4 and show why the order should be refused," the judge ruled.
The EFCC had on June 21 froze Fayose’s Zenith Bank accounts for allegedly being used to launder over N1.2 billion believed to be part of the arms fund from the office of ex-NSA, Sambo Dasuki.
Rather, Justice Taiwo Taiwo ordered the EFCC and Zenith Bank, the first and second defendants, to come on July 4 to show cause why the order being sought by Governor Fayose should be refused.
The judge held that with the kind of order being sought by Fayose, the defendants must be heard.
Justice Taiwo said he understood that Fayose enjoyed immunity and that the court could adjudicate on the matter as canvassed by his counsel, Mike Ozekhome, but held that the relief he sought was a mandatory order of the court.
“I agree that the applicant has immunity, pursuant to the provisions of the constitution. But it is glaring that the application he is requesting is a mandatory order to undo what had been done and the court can’t abdicate its duty under this circumstance.
“I am of the opinion that this mandatory order is better granted with the interlocutory order being sought through an application pending before the court, because the applicant has filed papers to this effect.
“I hereby ordered the first and second respondents to appear before this court on July 4 and show why the order should be refused," the judge ruled.
The EFCC had on June 21 froze Fayose’s Zenith Bank accounts for allegedly being used to launder over N1.2 billion believed to be part of the arms fund from the office of ex-NSA, Sambo Dasuki.







That's good for him.
ReplyDeleteThat's their cup of tea...
ReplyDeleteAh Fayose again, his business abeg
ReplyDeleteThe era of immunity with impunity is over. Let me borrow one of my brothers statement " the age of Methuselah has nothing to do with government, if Methuselah runs foul of the law, he will be jailed straight" Let me now rephrase the statement " the status of an individuals in Nigeria has nothing to do with law in PMB administration, if any Governor or Senator misbehaved, he/she will face trial in law court.
ReplyDeleteFreezing or no freezing of account! D question is d moni in d account is it his? He can't keep laying claim 2 wuh isn't is, if it was his hard earned moni den efcc is guilty, but since its 4rm ONSA dey ve everi right 2..
ReplyDelete#Issorite
ReplyDeleteThe era of immunity with impunity is over. Let me borrow one of my brothers statement " the age of Methuselah has nothing to do with government, if Methuselah runs foul of the law, he will be jailed straight" Let me now rephrase the statement " the status of an individuals in Nigeria has nothing to do with law in PMB administration, if any Governor or Senator misbehaved, he/she will face trial in law court.
ReplyDeleteTill then
ReplyDeleteFayose again! So he wants the court to help him de freeze his account when they have not finish their investigation.
ReplyDeleteGbam! If after the investigation/court case he is proven innocent of the accusations, it would be unfrozen then he can counter sue
DeleteOkooo till then.
ReplyDeleteI wonder y court will order a defreeze of his account while d law allows EFCC to do such
ReplyDeleteI suspect that he is friends with the judge
DeleteDey should not defreeze d account
ReplyDeleteOk ooooooooo....till then
ReplyDeleteabeg no defreeze am.
ReplyDelete#Olu,can you see?