I don't know if we should describe her as embattled Senator, but Stella Oduah has cried out over what she termed as “misinterpretation” over media reports which quoted a Supreme Court judgment to have sacked her and other federal lawmakers from Anambra State.
Reports in the media said that the apex court had ordered the replacement of Oduah and other lawmakers from the state, saying that their nomination to contest in the 2015 election was illegal.
She said that the judgement of the Supreme Court said that it was only the National Executive Council of a political party (in this case PDP) that had the legal right to sponsor candidates in an election.
Oduah, therefore, stressed that she and all the other lawmakers from Anambra state have not been sacked by the Supreme Court, contrary to media reports.
She said: “It is pertinent to note that this is a mere misinterpretation of the Supreme Court rulings and should be disregarded in all entirety. The Supreme Court did not order the withdrawal of the Certificates of Return issued by the Commission.
“It did not hold that the faction of the PDP had the right to sponsor candidates for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). It did not equally authorise the Commission to substitute our clients with the individuals whose names were on the list improperly allowed by the Commission,
“Series of judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria states that it is only the National Executive of the party that has the vires to sponsor candidates.”
- Who do we believe now... Stella Oduah or the supreme court judgment?
Reports in the media said that the apex court had ordered the replacement of Oduah and other lawmakers from the state, saying that their nomination to contest in the 2015 election was illegal.
But in a statement issued by Madam Stella's Press Secretary, Cynthia Ferdinand, she said that the report in the media was misleading as the apex court did not order the withdrawal of her certificate of return.
She said that the judgement of the Supreme Court said that it was only the National Executive Council of a political party (in this case PDP) that had the legal right to sponsor candidates in an election.
Oduah, therefore, stressed that she and all the other lawmakers from Anambra state have not been sacked by the Supreme Court, contrary to media reports.
She said: “It is pertinent to note that this is a mere misinterpretation of the Supreme Court rulings and should be disregarded in all entirety. The Supreme Court did not order the withdrawal of the Certificates of Return issued by the Commission.
“It did not hold that the faction of the PDP had the right to sponsor candidates for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). It did not equally authorise the Commission to substitute our clients with the individuals whose names were on the list improperly allowed by the Commission,
“Series of judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria states that it is only the National Executive of the party that has the vires to sponsor candidates.”
- Who do we believe now... Stella Oduah or the supreme court judgment?
Bloggers , its time you people need to set up committee for confirmation, so that there will be real fact before posting news online, there will be another thing but media will carry another thing entirely, we readers and listeners will then look like fools asking ourselves who to believe. This has to stop please. #ThankMeLater
ReplyDeleteOkey o. ND what's that on her head. Lol.
ReplyDeleteno need later we will know d truth. nenyeoma@gmail.com
ReplyDeleteShe is so confused! Let's wait and get a feedback Frm d supreme court for affirmation!
ReplyDeleteolutoscene1@gmail.com
#Olu,can you see?
She better go for clearification, bcos the Supreme Court is very clear there is no way the party decision can stand against that of the supreme so she better be well inform
ReplyDeleteSupreme Court said it all madam....
ReplyDeleteOlu famous second wife
I just about to ask o before I saw the last line. If anyone thinks its easy to accept defeat,they should ask olisa metuh.
ReplyDeleteI gues she's yet to get d msg officially.
ReplyDeleteThat's her palava
ReplyDeletedec.16th@yahoo.com
Hmmm who's telling the truth?
ReplyDeleteSo Stella has her own supreme court different from the one we know?
ReplyDeleteBarry
Those who are concerned with the interpretation if judgement should come out now!
ReplyDeleteTime will tell who is right
ReplyDeleteso now wat is Stella saying, wat is the implications or d supreme courts ruling on her mandate
ReplyDeleteShe better step down, she is no longer a senator
ReplyDeleteVery funny leaders shall.
ReplyDeleteOk now...Who then should we believe?...Anyway, We shall soon get to know the truth
ReplyDeleteWe are waiting to hear from court on the issue
ReplyDeleteEnter your comment... Make stella go seat down. Wc kind yeye talk b dt? Supreme court ruling is final. Abi she want to refer the case to customary court? Mak she park well.
ReplyDeleteCommittee for confirmation.. Lolzzz.... But itz kinda confusing naw wit her claim
ReplyDelete